Open Concept: Tax Grants for Human Capital—A New Approach to the Gig Economy in Low-Income Countries

Posted 1 week, 2 days ago | Originally written on 21 Jun 2025

1. The Opportunity

Across much of the Global South, young people are finding new footing in the global digital economy. Through platforms like Upwork, Remotasks, and Fiverr, a new generation is earning income, building skills, and participating in global labor markets—often from nothing more than a mobile phone and a prepaid data bundle.

But there’s a catch: most of these workers operate outside formal tax systems. When governments try to bring these earnings into the tax net, the response from platforms and workers is often swift and negative—services shut down, users vanish, and the informal economy deepens.

Yet this needn’t be a zero-sum game.

2. A New Idea: Tax Grants to Offset Gig Work Exemptions

What if low-income countries were encouraged to exempt digital gig earnings from tax for a time—and instead, received grants to compensate for the lost revenue?

Here’s the core idea:

Countries forgo taxing digital gig work (especially for youth and new entrants), but are compensated via a tax grant—a financial transfer from a development funder, like IDA, that recognizes the forgone revenue as an investment in human capital development.

This turns a hidden subsidy into a transparent developmental choice.

3. Why This Makes Sense

  • Gig work is a human capital accelerator: It teaches skills, builds professional identity, and connects workers to global standards and clients.
  • Taxing too early can stifle growth: A youth earning $150/month from online work may quit if faced with bureaucratic registration or tax bills. But given time, that same worker may grow into a full-fledged digital entrepreneur.
  • Governments face real constraints: They can’t afford to lose revenue. But if forgone taxes are offset by external support, they gain space to take risks that support youth.

4. How It Could Work (In Principle)

  • Countries define eligible earnings (e.g. from verified platforms or digital services exports).
  • They implement a time-bound tax exemption for individuals earning below a certain threshold (e.g. $6,000/year).
  • A development partner (e.g. IDA) provides a tax grant, calculated on estimated foregone revenue.
  • The grant could be outcome-linked: tied to job creation, upskilling, or growth in platform use.

5. What It Enables

  • Legal breathing room for gig workers to grow before formalization
  • Positive engagement with platforms, rather than adversarial enforcement
  • Clear signaling that digital livelihoods are part of national development strategies
  • Data generation: exemptions can be conditional on reporting, helping governments understand the sector better

6. Who Might Act on This

This isn’t a proposal in search of ownership—it’s an idea in the commons. It could be picked up by:

  • Policymakers looking for alternatives to blanket bans or early taxation
  • Development financiers looking for innovative fiscal tools
  • Researchers or think tanks exploring digital job pathways
  • Civil society advocates pushing for enabling environments for youth employment

7. Final Thought

Tax systems should not punish emerging opportunity. Especially when the opportunity is building skills, generating income, and expanding inclusion. A tax grant for human capital—especially in the gig economy—might just be the bridge between informality and sustainable, inclusive growth.